Also this is not 100% correct too, but right now I am too drunk to explain it in a language, that´s not my mother tongue.īut we are A VERY LITTLE BIT off topic now. I would call it "SIO2USB-Stick" as its only purpose is to connect a USB-Stick. Specs: Processor: 6508 8-bit (using a custom Motorola 6502 class) Processor speed: 1.79 Mhz Resolution: 256x224 (ntsc) or 256x239 (pal) Colors available: 52 Max Colors on screen: 16, 24 or 25. I know that there is a device called "SIO2USB", but only that the developers calls it like that, it does not mean that this is the one and only correct name for it. The Nintendos 8 bit console was Segas biggest rival for its Master System which was a huge hit as well at the time. It provides a connection to ANYTHING that uses USB. And in my eyes that´s more correct than "SIO2PC", as that implicates, that the device is only for connecting SIO to a PC, and that is not true. I do not agree: If a device provides a working port, it should be called like "Atari USB port".īut what we are talking about is a device that acts like a bridge from SIO TO USB, so I call it SIO2USB. I should have written: "We can discuss for years without a result that satisfies everybody." The ABBUC-RAF sio2usb is almost doing that, although it is still only for storage purpose (not even speaking about the incompatibility with certain usb sticks) so even the device ABBUC_Raf release, should not carry the name sio2usb. When that device would give us a working USB port, only that feature would truly justify the name 'sio2usb' Sio2USB for your device is definitely not a right name, since that device does NOT provide a working USB port for atari 8bit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |